tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830084253401570472.post8450922994658604094..comments2024-03-28T09:22:36.967+13:00Comments on Offsetting Behaviour: Hot Professors and Gresham's LawEric Cramptonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15831696523324469713noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830084253401570472.post-83258558931651521492010-11-09T14:22:40.617+13:002010-11-09T14:22:40.617+13:00@Andrew: Agreed. That's what Frances says too...@Andrew: Agreed. That's what Frances says too - that assertiveness rated as hot for men (correlated with wages) counts as not for women.Eric Cramptonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15831696523324469713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830084253401570472.post-80866637304564346342010-11-09T09:16:04.221+13:002010-11-09T09:16:04.221+13:00HOT actually means 2 different things as applied t...HOT actually means 2 different things as applied to men & to women. Women, it's more purely physical. Men, it involves more status, general awesomeness.<br /><br />So, the "hot" men SHOULD earn more returns...because their rated hotness has much more to do with their personalities.Andrew Breesehttp://perspectivism.livejournal.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830084253401570472.post-9465004375872680602010-11-08T14:10:00.697+13:002010-11-08T14:10:00.697+13:00^ Lol.^ Lol.Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07995395711510222406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830084253401570472.post-63061405755285566332010-11-06T22:00:33.053+13:002010-11-06T22:00:33.053+13:00Hmm, that oughtn't be the equilibrium result.Hmm, that oughtn't be the equilibrium result.Eric Cramptonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15831696523324469713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830084253401570472.post-88465857350698851412010-11-06T19:08:54.524+13:002010-11-06T19:08:54.524+13:00You're hot Dr. CramptonYou're hot Dr. CramptonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com