Monday, 15 September 2014

One of these is a lie

From February:
The GCSB and the SIS were asked whether they get funding directly or indirectly from the governments of Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom or the United States.

Both withheld the information. They also refused to say whether any foreign government paid for any positions within the agencies.

However, they did confirm that they do not collect wholesale metadata on New Zealanders and, to the best of their knowledge, American counterpart the National Security Agency does not either.
Today:
Vodafone is setting up cable and internet at our new house this morning. I should then be able to watch tonight's relevant programming.

If GCSB and the SIS were just playing semantics over the term "wholesale", I call that a lie.

I wrote in February:
The GCSB has to know that there's a strong chance that, if they have been collecting metadata or if the Americans have been collecting it here, it'll be revealed in the forthcoming Snowden releases. They'd also know that, if they lied to Parliament, it would be very bad, and that if the Americans were doing it here without GSCB's knowing about it, GCSB would be seen to be incompetent or wilfully ignorant. I further expect that Kiwis wouldn't have much truck with semantic tricks on verb tenses or definitions of "wholesale". And so I must expect that they know that it isn't being done here and hasn't been done here. This makes me happy.
I hope to stay happy.

Update: here's the RadioNZ interview with Greenwald.

2 comments:

  1. I'm expecting semantics along the lines of James Clapper's testimony to Congress. What I don't understand is how the GCSB thought mass surveillance is the answer to targetted cyber attacks. Really? So I should give up my privacy because a couple of businesses suffered 'cyber attacks' (whatever that means). If this is the case, it seems like a cynical ploy by GCSB to get what it wants by running around screaming fire.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is getting ridiculous. Snowden and his supporters seem to claim he worked on a new and suspiciously relevant program with every passing week.

    ReplyDelete