David Trafimow and Stephen Rice ask "What if Social Scientists had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?" (HT: @JavierAparicio). Here's the summary of reasons for rejecting a circular earth, Newton's laws of motion, and Borlaug's Green revolution, among others.
I'm reminded of the number of rejects Gordon Tullock received.I suppose Table 1 will be of value to referees in a hurry to come up with reasons for rejecting submissions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
As I am randomly likely to delete anonymous comments, please use a handle. Comments on older posts go into moderation; sorry if there are delays in hoisting your comment from the moderation pool. Note also that, due to quirks in Blogger's coding, comments appear date-stamped prior to the original post. Either that or I have remarkably prescient readers.